Economics
Meat feeds few at the
expense of many. For the sake of producing meat, grain that could feed people
feeds livestock instead. According to information compiled by the United States
Department of Agriculture, over ninety percent of all the grain produced in America
goes to feed livestock-cows, pigs, sheep, and chickens- that wind up on dinner
tables.(Frances Moore Lappe, Diet for a Small Planet, (New York Ballantine
Books, 1975), p. 12.) Yet the process of using grain to produce meat is
incredibly wasteful. Figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture show that
for every sixteen pounds of grain fed to cattle, we get back only one pound of
meat.(Ibid., p. 10.)
In Diet for a Small
Planet, Frances Moore Lappe asks us to imagine ourselves sitting down to an
eight-ounce steak. "Then imagine, the room filled with 45 to 50 people
with empty bowls in front of them. For the 'feed cost' of your steak, each of
their bowls could be filled with a full cup of cooked cereal grains.''(Ibid.,
p. 235.)
Affluent nations do
not only waste their own grains to feed livestock. They also use protein-rich
plant foods from poor nations. Dr. Georg Borgstrom, an authority on the
geography of food, estimates that one-third of Africa's peanut crop (and
peanuts give the same amount of protein as meat) ends up in the stomachs of
cattle and poultry in Western Europe.(Georg Borgstrom cited in Frances Moore
Lappe, Diet for a Small Planet, p. 25.)
In underdeveloped
countries, a person consumes an average of four hundred pounds of grain a year,
most of it by eating it directly. In contrast, says world food authority Lester
Brown, the average European or American goes through two thousand pounds a
year, by first feeding almost ninety percent of it to animals for meat. The average
European or American meat-eater, Brown says, uses five times the food resources
of the average Colombian, Indian, or Nigerian.(Lester Brown cited in Vic
Sussman, The Vegetarian Alternative (Rodale Press, 1978), p. 234.)
Facts such as these
have led food experts to point out that the world hunger problem is artificial.
Even now, we are already producing more than enough food for everyone on the
planet-but we are allocating it wastefully.
Harvard nutritionist
Jean Mayer estimates that bringing down meat production by only ten percent
would release enough grain to feed sixty million people.(Dr. Jean Mayer cited
by the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, Dietary Goals
for the U.S. (Washington, D.C.: February 1977), p. 44.)
Another price we pay
for meat-eating is degradation of the environment. The heavily contaminated
runoff and sewage from slaughterhouses and feedlots are major sources of
pollution of rivers and streams. It is fast becoming apparent that the fresh
water resources of this planet are not only becoming contaminated but also
depleted, and the meat industry is particularly wasteful. Georg Borgstrom says
the production of livestock creates ten times more pollution than residential
areas, and three times more than industry.(Georg Borgstrom cited in Frances
Moore Lappe, Diet for a Small Planet, p. 32.)
In their book Population,
Resources, and Environment, Paul and Anne Ehrlich show that to grow one
pound of wheat requires only sixty pounds of water, whereas production of one
pound of meat requires anywhere from 2,500 to 6,000 pounds of water.(Paul and
Anne Ehrlich, Population, Resources, Environment, W.H. Freeman and Company,
1970, p. 64.)
And in 1973 the New
York Post uncovered a shocking misuse of this most valuable resource-one
large chicken-slaughtering plant in the United States was using one hundred
million gallons of water daily, an amount that could supply a city of
twenty-five thousand people.("Food Price Rises," Sylvia Porter, New
York Post, July 27, 1973.)
But now let's turn
from the world geopolitical situation, and get right down to our own
pocketbooks. A spot check of supermarkets in New York in January 1986 showed
that sirloin steak cost around four dollars a pound, while ingredients for a
delicious, substantial vegetarian meal average less than two dollars a pound.
An eight ounce container of cottage cheese costing sixty cents provides sixty
percent of the minimum daily requirement of protein. Becoming a vegetarian
could potentially save you at least several thousand dollars a year, tens of
thousands of dollars over the course of a lifetime. The savings to America's
consumers would amount to billions of dollars annually. And the same principle
applies to consumers all over the world. Considering all this, it's hard to see
how anyone could afford not to become a vegetarian.
No comments:
Post a Comment